Story titles: "Psychic Web site forecast - Local address will expose frauds" and "If you know JETIU, this site's for you". This article says that KD "claims personally to have predicted events ranging from…" which is insulting considering these predictions were made "live" on Radio, TV and/or newsprint (including the Edmonton Sun) long before the events took place. All the accurate hits and the few misses predicted by Kimberlee Dawn are a matter of record not self-proclaimed blah blah. In the article of Aug. 24, 2000 KD stated that the public need beware people using terms such as power in association with psychic works or abilities, therefore, please note that the statement referring to "telekinetic powers" in the Aug. 25, 2000 article is a misquote. During the interview with this reporter KD did not state that this site would teach courses regarding "how to operate a paranormal consulting business". Rather, it was imparted that the purpose of the courses on this site are designed to give instruction for the purpose of legitimate psychics to operate an ethical practice and for non-psychics to responsibly operate one of the many psychic-related business's that the new-age consumer frequents in our society. That the site overall is designed to educate the consumer to the fact that only a genetic psychic can provide real psychic services and all others should not be using the term psychic if that is not what they are qualified to operate. The site is to educate the psychic-services or psychic-related services shopper in defining the difference between the two categories.

The article refers to information KD imparted regarding the testing of children who are proposed to be psychic, the reporter refers to her testing methods as "Dawn's acid test" and KD information was sorely misrepresented in this article…(by the way our mothers taught us to refer to people respectfully as Mr., Mrs., or Ms. when addressing them by their surname). The ex-magician who's unqualified opinion was used in this article as the controversial "other side of the coin" is quoted as saying (in regard to psychics testing a proposed psychic child) that, "the child will be tested on whether he can identify a hidden object in a strange house. But if the child gets anything at all right just by guessing - if he says there's a flight of stairs in the house, for instance - they'll immediately claim he was close and he has the power." Is this comment used in this article to insinuate that such a horrific practice would in any way be offered or practiced as part of this site's professional services works? The reporter was informed by KD that all factors of testing must be carefully considered as the child must be proven beyond a doubt to have genetic psychic abilities and it must too be determined carefully which abilities in particular the child may or may not be gifted in. The reporter was also informed by KD that this would include an assortment of tests be administered to first determine what ability is being exhibited by the child (or any proposed psychic) and following this the testing would need to continue to suit the particular ability's mechanics so that a degree of the exhibited ability could be determined and properly assessed for further utilization alone or in combination with other (if any) abilities the subject may display.

The article goes on to state that "if it were up to" the ex-magician "the test would be slightly more rigorous. The child would be given a list of 20 objects, only one of which has been hidden." JETIU Company would like to state, for the record, that a proposed psychic child should not know what he/she is looking for or given any list or even a suggestion of what she/he is psychically "looking" for. And that in the event that list would (for some legitimate reason) be issued to a research team member, a staircase, a lamp or a table should certainly not be part of that list nor considered in any way valuable to the test. An exact geographical location of a staircase including it's depth, width, unusual features or other unique but specific details would in fact be considered valuable material when derived by a test subject who has never been in the target location and who can be guaranteed never to have seen a blueprint (or data) of the target address/building. At least two or three unrelated parties who are not in the child's presence, unrelated to the child, and qualified (preferably of course by multi-disciplinary authorities) as unbiased to the experimentation's success or failure, should have a complete list, photographs, video and any other related details of the remote target contents to verify the child's success or failure-as it is they who ultimately determine that success or failure. They however are not on the target site during the test nor are they in standard physical communication with the child or the child's significant others. It is up to the child to identify the primary target (that which is specifically placed and identified as the one item the child must be able to psychically find and describe out of the many items that are otherwise available in the target location). The child should not be made aware of what or where the primary target is, neither in fact should any one who is related to the child or whom is biased in the experiment's end result be privy to this information to avoid an accidental telepathic complication regarding testing which certainly depends on testing for other than telepathic ability. As suggested by the illusionist, requesting a child to identify 20 objects by random is far from being a reliable tag in psychic testing, it is also far too taxing on the child and would require a cruel amount of mental exertion for a psychic child to attempt to absolutely identify 20 items or one from a selection of 20 in one test period. We want to test them not harm them. The stress value and all other possible contaminants in a genuine psychic test must be considered for any results - good or bad - in order to be verified by the testing group's authorities. The groups authorities must be educated of these contaminants by a proven psychic who is field experienced - no one else has the qualifications to even guess at the contaminates nor their possibilities. The reporter, instead of quoting KD who is a proven professional chose to instead quote an unqualified voice. Would not a parapsychologist or other qualified PSI discipline specialist be a more exacting source of information for his report?

Good thing we at JETIU Company don't leave the testing of psychic abilities (and particularly our children) up to people such as ex-magicians or reporters.

The point of inquiring of an interview at all was as a means to inform the public that finally a trusted source of information and professionalism had come forth with the truth behind the psychic business and abilities, and that while the site was in infancy stages the need was so desired by the public that the response was already overwhelming - without the site even being listed on any search engines. We at JETIU Company thought this public response to this site (an obvious indicator of the public need of this service) to be newsworthy. We felt that the greater public deserved to know of this site's existence.

The Edmonton Sun has been very supportive of Kimberlee Dawn and her Consumer Awareness campaign over the years, providing the reading audience with safe information by a personality that maintains a reputation of ethical practice --who is easily researched right in their own city. We at JETIU Company appreciate the Edmonton Sun's News department's attention regarding a story we felt was important to the reading audience. However, the reporter's slant on this article demanded we address it.