Browse
the Topics
Political and Governments
Technology/Exploration
Religious/Spiritual
Natural Disasters
Scientific Breakthroughs
Hollywood Gossip
|
|
Part
1 | Part 2
Political
and Governments (pt.1)
1.
prediction: ·
(Where is Carlos Santagia? I do not know where this name
came from.) I saw an abduction of an adult male who is
in a position of authority with a corporation or government,
he is not found alive. This makes headline news but it
feels as from a country other than Canada is that why
the name came up - so that I would know what Country this
takes place in? If so, it didn't help because I still
don't know what Country it is.
2. prediction: · India and Pakistan - they are
a threat to the entire world at this time and for many
years to come. And while the diplomatic issues are delicate,
China's interference / involvement and revealed support
of these two warring areas does not go unnoticed; providing
for a more serious situation yet. China reports that it
is not in support - and admits that there was a time when
it was- but since has stopped, however, they have not.
This is the reason this is a delicate situation. China
also wishes to appear supportive to the officials that
matter in Pakistan because they are gathering intelligence
for their own safety and welfare. Much of the alleged
support they are providing, it is also true that they
(China) are willing to allow a minor nuclear threat disguise
a much larger one so that the people of china will not
know of the danger and or think the Chinese government
is in control of the danger. This is a complicated prediction
with so damn many ins and outs that I can't get it on
paper at this time. Other than to say this will be headline
news and a serious fear to all peoples, I can't get it
all down for this report. I am not afraid however, as
China will allow no serious threat to the peoples of China
(which in effect includes our side of the world).
comments: From an article
in the Washington Post July 14, 2000: "China threatens
arms control collapse" States that John Deutch, Harold
Brown, and William Perry, all former senior U.S security
officials, have argued publicly that China can be expected
to increase its arsenal and drop cooperation on arms control
and non proliferation. That, in turn could spur India,
which also detonated a nuclear device in 1998, and then
Pakistan, to do the same, they have warned." I think that
that statement pretty much sums it up, I believe that
we are looking at a chain of events unfolding that manifests
itself in further more sever conflicts between India and
Pakistan. (For more information on this prediction look
to our 2001 predictions)
An Article from The Edmonton Sun, Saturday, June 24, 2000
"CHINA EXPANDS MISSILE FORCE THREATENING TAIWAN, SAYS
U.S.": Washington (AP) . I felt this article was important
to the previous prediction, this is a prelude to the India
and Pakistan issue somehow, as if it starts the rollercoaster
of discovery regarding this prediction. It is one of the
in's and out's of this complicated prediction.
3. prediction: · More news on Bill Clinton, he
can be such a bad boy and yet such a good boy too. A president
should be a national hero in more ways than war strategy.
And he does seem to want to leave a mark in history other
than for an oval office oral sexcapade. This turns out
to be an act that he committed without intentions of media
or promotions kudos. That's nice, but of course he'll
be accused of waggin the dog, which he wasn't in this
incident. How long does Bill and Hillary keep up the pretense
of married with children? Soon after he is retired out
of the big office he and she seek more obviously separate
quarters than we see at this time, outright divorce isn't
good for either's public career image and will be difficult
to publicly negotiate - but it will be done.
comments: I believe the speech
he gave regarding the mapping of the human DNA is the
act without intention of self-promotions that I predicted
here.
4. prediction: · Can you believe it - Sadam Hussien
rears his ugly head again and not only petitions for help
but then-after getting some assistance for his desperate
people- again bites the hand that feeds it (or mends it).
A lot of countries at odds here as to how to go about
dealing with this and America is unwilling to relent at
all until it becomes apparent that the united nations
is not either willing to be pushed around. Who's ugly
here, Sadam (Iraq) or USA? This time the UN and NATO are
not as despondent about USA's actions as previous. Eventually
in the not too far future (within 3 to 4 years) Saddam
will actually pass away. I don't know if I should list
this as a World Emergency or under the Political News
Category - it's both.
comments: News, Jan 13, 2001:
From Baghdad (Reuters) - The "Conscience International"
organization, airlifted medicine, medical equipment and
school supplies to Baghdad without U.S. government authorization
on a chartered plane from Royal Jordanian airlines. Conscience
International said they were in Baghdad to defy the U.S.
led United Nations sanctions on Iraq. Under a special
deal with the United Nations, Baghdad is allowed to sell
oil to buy food, medicine and other humanitarian needs
for the Iraqi people but Baghdad says that 1.5 million
people have died due to shortages of these necessities.
5. prediction: · A poisoning of a government official
or otherwise person of importance. I had no other information
other than poisoning was the tool used because it wasn't
as suspect or as guarded a security issue. Is this a Canadian
assassin? I don't know - or one who pretended to be Canadian?
This is more likely.
6. prediction: - Canadian Federal Election of Nov.
28, 2000: (This prediction was written Nov. 22/00. On
November 24, 2000 this document was submitted to Terry
Evans and Bill Cowen both of Edmonton, Alberta's K-Roc
Radio FM and Dale Floyd of Vancouver, B.C.'s CFUN AM "Martial
Arts Radio" show, for validation of it's date and contents).
Current Canadian Première Chretien wins it's a tight race
between the three Liberal, Alliance and NDP, which is
surprising because everyone thinks the tight race is between
Liberal and Alliance. Many people are afraid that if they
vote NDP they won't have enough votes Canada Wide to actually
bring them (NDP's) into office, and in this the Alliance
Party would win, so, those who would actually prefer NDP
are voting Liberal just to make sure Alliance Party doesn't
win. The Alliance Party will be the official opposition
but the NDPs will act as the official opposition to both
the Alliance and ruling Liberal governments according
to their boisterous and hard-hitting actions and public
comments in the house and in the media. As much as this
is an odd statement regarding who's the official opposition,
it is made while I watch the NDP's activities, so I must
say that regardless of the paperwork/official status,
it's really a toss up regarding who is the official opposition
and who is acting like the primary official opposition.
NDP's will be so close to the winner's seat in the next
election (after the 2000 election) that we should keep
our eye on them. They are up against tough competition,
more-so than we've seen in awhile as the Liberal Party
is bringing out a shoot-from-the-hip personality and the
Alliance is revamping their attitudes and working some
spin magic regarding their public appeal. As far as Chretien's
(pre-elections) comments alluding to his possibly retiring
after the 2000 election is over, I wouldn't count on it.
I find that he is the type of man who likes to keep his
"finger in the pie" so to speak; out and out retirement
would rub against his very nature. I did predict previously
that he has a sad situation in his life and looking back
on this prediction I could easily see him requiring three
to four months off work, even a bit longer if the situation
is not resolved as expected, but other than a complete
physical breakdown I would not predict a complete exit
for Jean. For more on Kimberlee Dawn's 1999 prediction
that "Chretien does not step down" and more go to Year
of 1999- World Predictions. |